- Subscribe
- Log In More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
- Basket
- Search More
Advanced search
- Latest content
- Current issue
- Archive
- Authors
- About
- Podcasts
Advanced search
- CloseMore
Main menu
- Latest content
- Current issue
- Archive
- Authors
- About
- Podcasts
See AlsoNHANES 2015-2016: Demographic Variables and Sample Weights Data Documentation, Codebook, and FrequenciesCEOs made nearly 200 times what their workers got paid last yearTechnical Information and Specifications for 1939 and 1940 Chevrolet TruckWhat a Stock Split Is and How It Works, With an Example - Subscribe
- Log in More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
- BMJ Journals
You are here
- Home
- Archive
- Volume 83,Issue Suppl 1
- OP0032 GENDER DISPARITIES IN OSTEOPOROSIS DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH VERTEBRAL FRACTURES: INSIGHTS FROM A LARGE-SCALE DATABASE STUDY
Email alerts
Article Text
Article menu
- Article Text
- Article info
- Citation Tools
- Share
- Rapid Responses
- Article metrics
- Alerts
Scientific Abstracts
Oral Abstract Presentations
Clinical Abstract Sessions: Risk factors and treatment in osteoporosis
OP0032 GENDER DISPARITIES IN OSTEOPOROSIS DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH VERTEBRAL FRACTURES: INSIGHTS FROM A LARGE-SCALE DATABASE STUDY
- R. Ali1,
- H. Al-Sudani2,
- M. Hanoodi3,
- I. Tskhakaia4,
- A. Lau5,
- I. Tan5
- 1Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Rheumatology, Philadelphia, United States of America
- 2Jefferson Einstein Montgomery, Internal Medicine, East Norriton, United States of America
- 3Nuvance Health at the Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Poughkeepsie, United States of America
- 4Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, United States of America
- 5Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Rheumatology, Philadelphia, United States of America
Abstract
Background: Vertebral fractures are the most common of all osteoporotic fractures, the risk of which increases with age. Bone density begins to decrease after age 40, with more decline in postmenopausal women. Caucasian women are particularly at increased risk. Whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, vertebral fracture can affect patients’ health and quality of life. A bone density scan is important for diagnosing underlying osteoporosis, which increases the risk of recurrent fractures.
Objectives: In our observational, retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare the rates of osteoporosis diagnosis, bone density scans, and treatment between male and female cohorts with vertebral fractures but no prior osteoporosis diagnosis. This study was conducted using the TriNetX database, which encompasses electronic health records from >80 diverse global healthcare organizations.
Methods: Two cohorts were established using the TriNetX database: women (Cohort 1) and men (Cohort 2). We included patients aged 55 years and above in both groups. The index event was the initial appearance of a vertebral fracture diagnosis, using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. We excluded patients who had osteoporosis fractures prior to the vertebral fracture. Propensity score matching was employed for age and race/ethnicity. Our outcome of interest included osteoporosis diagnosis, the occurrence of bone density scans, and osteoporosis treatment within three years of the index event (vertebral fracture). The studied osteoporosis treatments included bisphosphonates, denosumab, romosozumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, and raloxifene. We used measures of association to calculate the risk and risk ratio showing the difference in the occurrence of outcomes in patients with vertebral fracture.
Results: The analysis involved 194,638 women and 112,067 men with vertebral fractures. The age at the time of vertebral fracture was slightly different between the two cohorts. Both groups consisted primarily of a white population. After propensity score matching, 108,718 patients from each group were included in the analysis. 20.128% of women (compared to 10.538% of men) were diagnosed with osteoporosis within 3 years of vertebral fracture diagnosis, with a risk difference of 9.59% and a risk ratio of 1.91 (95% CI: 1.862, 1.96; P < 0.0001).[Figure 1] Bone density scans were conducted in 0.029% of women and 0.009% of men, with a risk ratio of 3.102 (95% CI: 1.521, 6.326; P value 0.0010). The low number of bone density scans is explained by the fact that some of the healthcare organizations participating with TriNetX don’t report diagnostic tests. Regarding treatment, 13.998% of women and 8.222% of men received osteoporosis treatment, with a risk difference of 5.776% (P < 0.0001), a risk ratio of 1.702 (95% CI 1.659, 1.747), and the odds ratio was 1.817, favoring women.[Figure 2]
Conclusion: This study highlights a significant gender disparity in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with vertebral fractures. Women were more likely than men to be diagnosed with and treated for osteoporosis. These findings suggest a potential underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporosis in men with vertebral fractures, underscoring the need for more vigilant screening and management strategies in this demographic.
- Download figure
- Open in new tab
- Download powerpoint
Figure 1.
women vs men diagnosed with osteoporosis within 3 years after vertebral fracture diagnosis.
- Download figure
- Open in new tab
- Download powerpoint
Figure 2.
women vs men received osteoporosis treatment within 3 years after vertebral fracture diagnosis.
REFERENCES: NIL.
Acknowledgements: NIL.
Disclosure of Interests: None declared.
- Public health
- Sex/gender/diversity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Public health
- Sex/gender/diversity
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens